towards their own as any suit in Washington D.C. But “Once Upon A Time” takes this opportunity and mostly squanders it, reframing the murders as a story about white male heroism that does a disservice both to Tate and to the story Tarantino was ostensibly trying to explore.
When Sharon Tate is finally allowed to speak, a full hour into the film, we quickly lose sight of her again as the camera gets caught up in the whirl of bodies and a cacophony of cameo appearances in a restaging of famous Hollywood parties of the era. But Tarantino isn’t interested in who Sharon Tate was, anyway. All he cares about is what she represents: a sex symbol, a woman cut down in her prime, all hair and eyes and period costumes. Not that Robbie doesn’t make a meal of it; she’s far too good an actress to be completely overlooked. But the portrait of Tate that emerges isthe director and script, not because of it.
THINK ....or the movie was about two men, set to the back drop of the Manson murders,. It was never about Tate. go watch it, its fun. Silly silly person.
THINK Not just men, but WHITE MEN!!!! HISSSSSSS!!!!
THINK Report the damn news and stop making up bullshit!
THINK anibundel has a job offering intelligent reviews gives hope to anyone off the street that they can be brain surgeons.
THINK Ridiculous. That WAS life in ‘69.