An unsettled contradiction at the heart of Trump’s immunity claim

  • 📰 MSNBC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 20 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 51%

MSNBC News

Entertainment Entertainment Latest News,Entertainment Entertainment Headlines

Steve Benen is a producer for 'The Rachel Maddow Show,' the editor of MaddowBlog and an MSNBC political contributor. He's also the bestselling author of 'The Impostors: How Republicans Quit Governing and Seized American Politics.'

As Donald Trump’s lawyer, D. John Sauer, tried to convince the U.S. Supreme Court that his client should have immunity from prosecution, there was a phrase the defense attorney turned to on several occasions. “A former president,” Sauer said, “has permanent criminal immunity for his official acts, unless he was first impeached and convicted” in Congress.

’s Chris Hayes was understandably exasperated by this as the oral arguments progressed. This might seem a little complicated at first glance, but it’s actually entirely straightforward: In early 2021, Trump’s lawyers said during his second impeachment trial that there was no need for the Senate to convict the former president, because the matter was better left to the judiciary.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 469. in ENTERTAİNMENT

Entertainment Entertainment Latest News, Entertainment Entertainment Headlines