a “sufficiently creative way that the resulting work constitutes an original work of authorship” could qualify for copyright.
Human involvement in, and ultimate creative control over, the work at issue was key to the conclusion that the new type of work fell within the bounds of copyright.” The ruling arrives as a whole host of emerging issues surround the use of AI in the arts—not least of which being its position as
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more: