What was happening here? That Chrystia Freeland was the Chosen One to sit with the formidable Arkansas battler, email-reductionist, rather than, say, Mélanie Joly or Mary Ng, was a signal of succession — “I followed Bill, you will follow Justin.”
“In many ways, the Liberal Party of Canada is a trailbreaker,” Clinton said. “I think the idea of a feminist set of policies, a feminist economic policy, is exactly where you need to be if you want to increase economic opportunity and economic output.” Fortunately, I have both. Is it not at least curious that the party, always warning and hot-tempered about “American style” politics should seek and find the avatar of American style politics as the “draw” for their conclave? Was there no “eminent Canadian” — possibly a former University President — theyRaymond J. de Souza: Only Justin Trudeau would try to put himself above the King
There is another question? Why Hillary at all? Is Hillary really the best beacon for modern feminism? There are some not-so-subtle perplexities in her commitment to that doctrine that extend from Arkansas to the White House . Politics, it may be, is stronger than the rally cry of Me/Too. Naturally, Ms. Freeland did not trouble Ms. Clinton with these perplexities.