about their original craftsmanship powering AI generators without informed consent. “Their works are being inputted into a machine against their will,” says Krichevsky. “This machine is specifically designed to replace us.” Companies behind AI generators will soon be in court to defend againstDespite the legal challenges, widespread use of AI art tools continues to cause confusion.
He says, “Maybe they're just kind of dead and staring out into nowhere, or they have strange structures.” Logan doesn’t expect the small cues an average viewer can use for AI art identification to stick around very long either. Multiple artists we interviewed agreed that such telltale signs will become less evident as the technology progresses, and the developers behind those tools adjust them to address common complaints like dead eyes and too many fingers.
Does anyone else see the irony that the 1st profession to be threatened by AI tech is art?
Right now 90% of what most people own as “art” is likely machine generated in production anyway. Prints, sculpture etc etc. very few can afford to buy art with any meaningful value as an “investment”. If a human artist can’t be differentiated from AI output is it art?
Human artists in general or genius-level human artists?
For more on where AI is headed, tune into NPR’s 1A podcast Tuesday through Thursday at 10 am ET for Know It All: 1A and WIRED’s Guide to AI: Call the number below to share your questions and experiences with AI:
I guarantee this is already causing a lot of existential terror and depression. Big tech is destroying jobs AND the creative fallbacks we all collectively assumed we’d have once automation inevitably took over everything.