Getty's CEO, Craig Peters, had previously said that there are concerns for AI-created artwork, including"unaddressed rights issues.""Getty Images believes artificial intelligence has the potential to stimulate creative endeavors," asays."Accordingly, Getty Images provided licenses to leading technology innovators for purposes related to training artificial intelligence systems in a manner that respects personal and intellectual property rights.
It all comes down to how an AI is trained—the all-important preliminary step to building a functioning artificial intelligence tool.
In this fight, Im on team injuries
Ensures the difference between an ai using references and an artist using them? Styles are not copyrightable. Humans cannot create anything original anymore, we just combine images from our own recollection of shit we've seen. Just like AI does.
drawcels batting for gettyimages
RafaLagoon How is called when a Evil guy fights another Evil guy?
Luis_pastor
I want both sides to lose
Getty images has entered the chat.
Have a feeling we’ll be seeing a LOT of these 🫢
I am not a fun of Getty images but definitely AI art should be regulated somehow. At the moment is definitely not fair to the rest of the artists at all
Nice
GettyImages business model is clearly threatened. You won't need to spend $500 on a single image soon, you'll be able to generate your own.
So happy for Getty! Good job. If there is no consent for using the art, then it’s grounds to sue!
Just to say, that ALL AI are using people data without consent. boycottAI
W Getty
This is what we've all been waiting for. The AI losers stepped on the wrong toes and may actually have to answer for building so entirely off other artists work.
Small artists haven’t been able to defend their work but now here comes Getty Images to shake up the playing field. 🤣
Beavs Isn’t Getty Images the people that steal art and then sell it for people to use?
lol Imagine being an illustrator or artist and cheering for Getty images. They just want the tech to be in private, centralized hands so they can create their own paid models
Getty, who tried to claim licensing rights over a public domain image of the coronavirus, and whom tries to extract licensing fees over public domain works? Why Getty? Hey those fighting in court over this tech, IMO, Getty is the LAST group you should be rooting on/for.
Derivative work does not violate copyright. Getty is super litigious, so I hope they sink.
Hmm. I believe I see a kettle over there
Copyright shouldn't even exist. Let AI art flourish.
Brace yourselves, the backlash begins. AI winter is coming.
Good luck with that suit.
all while getty is being sued by the woman who took millions of pictures she released to the public domain that getty stole and licensed without her consent or permission
Wow, Getty Images should watch out for making claims that they haven't proven (or have been proven).
Entertainment Entertainment Latest News, Entertainment Entertainment Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: leedslivenews - 🏆 118. / 51 Read more »