How House of the Dragon saved Game of Thrones' legacy | Digital Trends

  • 📰 DigitalTrends
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 105 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 45%
  • Publisher: 65%

Entertainment Entertainment Headlines News

Entertainment Entertainment Latest News,Entertainment Entertainment Headlines

HouseoftheDragon did the impossible: it renewed fans' interest in the tarnished GameofThrones brand, pointing at a promising future for the franchise.

May 19, 2019, is a date branded on the pop culture lexicon. The finale to Game of Thrones, the television phenomenon that single-handedly revitalized the fantasy genre and redefined what “event television” meant, aired to the collective disappointment of millions of fans. The show’s decline in quality had begun in season 7, with some questionable choices happening as far back as season 5, but the trainwreck that was season 8 was beyond words.

Dany was Thrones‘ ultimate champion; unlike Tyrion, she had actual power; unlike Jon, she wasn’t afraid to use it. Daenerys represented the best of Game of Thrones; she was strong, willfully, imperfect, and captivating, an inspiring but ruthless character who had everything necessary to take the Iron Throne.

GoT needed more time and patience to make her descent into tyranny work; instead, it settled for cheap shortcuts, fridging Missandei and turning Tyrion into a failure. However, the show’s most egregious crime was nerfing the dragons, turning them from powerful weapons to flying plot devices. By undermining the dragons, the show ultimately undermined itself.

Game of Thrones waited years before Dany rode a dragon and even more before she used her children in battle. House of the Dragon wastes no time introducing its dragons, but its antidote to GoT‘s restraint is not excess. Season 1 serves as the prelude for the Dance, setting the stage and the main players but saving the best for later. Still, the show provided enough hints of what was to come for fans to trust it could pull off the Dance’s most important battles.

Rhaenyra and Alicent are intriguing, if somewhat one-dimensional, characters on the page. Martin remains as engaging a storyteller as ever, but the sheer scope of Fire & Blood prevents him from fully exploring the intricate inner workings of any of its characters; the book is about the game, not the players. Thus, Rhaenyra and Alicent exist as ideas rather than fully-fledged characters, which fits the “history retold” angle that Fire & Blood adopts.

For her part, Alicent receives a genuine and compelling motive for her actions beyond jealousy and power lust. GoT never shied away from portraying sympathetic antagonists, crafting some of the most engaging villains in modern television, and Alicent lives up to that legacy. Even if the show encourages us to stand against her, her journey, coupled with Olivia Cooke’s vulnerable performance, makes Alicent one of the best characters in House of the Dragon.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

It did the opposite for me.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 95. in ENTERTAİNMENT

Entertainment Entertainment Latest News, Entertainment Entertainment Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

‘Yellowstone’ Is Not A Red-State ‘Game Of Thrones’, Creator Taylor Sheridan SaysAnyone who thinks Yellowstone is a conservative show probably never watched it, creator Taylor Sheridan says. Sheridan made his comment in an interview with The Atlantic on the eve of the show&821… No, it’s ‘Sons of Anarchy’ on horses I love his contempt for his audience. That's always fun. It's because I've watched every episode that I've called it a Republican show. 😆 But I'm still looking forward to the new season and prequel spinoff
Source: DEADLINE - 🏆 109. / 63 Read more »