Before Johnny Depp and Amber Heard, Sondra Locke and Clint Eastwood’s Harrowing Court Battle Dominated the Tabloids

  • 📰 VanityFair
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 25 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 55%

Entertainment Entertainment Headlines News

Entertainment Entertainment Latest News,Entertainment Entertainment Headlines

Before there was Depp v. Heard, there was Locke v. Eastwood.

“If you look at [Locke’s lawsuits], money was the issue. Somebody can make up stories and put on an act and play the victim…. Some people feel that the world owes them a living.

” It was the narrative that seemed to dominate coverage, though Locke herself hadAfter Eastwood settled with Locke out of court in the second case, sheshe felt the lawsuit sent a “loud and clear” message to Hollywood, “that people cannot get away with whatever they want to just because they’re powerful.” Nearly 30 years later, we find ourselves at a similar moment, wondering whether a powerful man will win his case, when it seems he’s already won over the court of public opinion.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

did she chop off his finger too?

I don’t see Clint Eastwood having any similarities to Johnny Depp. ClintEastwood has never been know as an addict to drugs or alcohol. He’s never hit a woman.

It's not the same because now we have heard the recordings. She has lied from the beginning setting him up. When you've gone through DV it's disgusting to see her, she's making fun of us. You can't cover 'blows' with makeup, imagine getting hit with rings.

At the least, Sondra Locke could act and, from what I know, did not use children with cancer and victims of DV to boost her public image. In the name of all that’s holy, Amber accused Johnny of forcibly raping her with the broken handle of a rum bottle.

Maybe Amber was inspired by this very story. You know, since she is a female psychopath. And yes, Johny thought he was leveraging his power, age, and fame to attain a much younger, more attractive partner. She saw the above as his weakness and the latter as her leverage.

The problem is, Amber NEVER ONCE mentioned sexual violence in ANY of the tapes. THEREFORE, SHE IS LYING!

AMBER LIED

Shouldn't it be called Palimoney?

There was a Sudden Impact.

I didn’t know Amber’s name until this latest trial. Sondra Locke may not have been Clint famous but Locke was more famous than Heard. What was their Q score? (Learned that from the trail)

There was also Tarantino v Thurman

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 391. in ENTERTAİNMENT

Entertainment Entertainment Latest News, Entertainment Entertainment Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Johnny Depp, back on stand, calls Heard abuse claims 'cruel' and 'false'Actor Johnny Depp returned to the witness stand on Wednesday to refute his ex-wife Amber Heard's testimony in their multi-million dollar defamation battle, saying the abuse claims she leveled against him were 'unimaginably brutal, cruel and false.' Hey I’d like to understand how this is science news exactly. Or is this an attempt at balancing quality with engagement?
Source: ReutersScience - 🏆 559. / 51 Read more »