This week, lawyers representing Prince Andrew in the U.S. filed to have the lawsuit dismissed before Prince Andrew is forced to give testimony under oath. A 38-page memo from his legal team that went public called Giuffre’s claims “frivolous” and “lurid,” and accused her of trying to “seek a payday at [Andrew’s] expense.” The document also claims that Giuffre signed an agreement with Epstein in 2009 that exempted Prince Andrew from being sued by her, as well.
In response, Giuffre’s lawyer, David Boies, slammed the Duke’s response for trying to bring in facts that were in dispute in the motion to dismiss, instead of at trial where they can be actually proven or disproven. “Andrew’s bid to dismiss the lawsuit fails to confront the serious allegations,” Boies wrote.This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
There is no justification for a society to put one family on a pedestal and allow them such privileges and rewards.This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.Either Prince Andrew doesn't know Virginia Giuffre, or he had her sign a legal document.