Two images that show we need to be sensitive about our photos | Paul Chadwick

You need a public editor.

Seriously? ‘We must pander to the sensibilities of Islam no matter how stupid, but relatives of a dead person can swivel’ You a sad and pathetic imitation of your former self guardian, please stop genuflecting to the most regressive, intolerant, evil, ideology on the planet.

So You need someone to tell you to be sensitive . You should already have that knowledge.

So what this article is saying is: We must not offend those who use religion in which to murder ,death , kill as they have feeling too. Typical ethical latte drinkers

I object to your 'feigns religiosity' in reference to terrorists who are muslim. It isn't up to you or me to say they're feigning. You print that people's gender is defined by who they believe themselves to be. The same must be applied to religion. 1

Pathetic

So, in other words you bend to the Muslim’s request to remove a ‘sensitive’ photo that rightly connects Islamic belief to a terrorist, but decline a request from other community members to remove a photo of an unconscious friend, that they consider to be sensitive. F*ck you.

Is it true only Muslims are allowed into Mecca ?

“...terrorist acts are committed in the name of a political ideology that feigns religiosity”. Really, Until we accept the role Islam so clearly plays in the mindset of those who commit these atrocities, we fail to address the reform the doctrine so clearly needs.

You need to bend over more than that, Paul. Wow! You guys are nearly there, eh? Sharia-complaint. Wow! Normally we wouldn’t care some religious types are “offended”. Grow up. Pull up your pants & get on with it. Suck it up, buttercup. But no! You guys now do abject apologies! 🤣

Highly disrespectful to take this images without asking... these men and women see enough hatred and discrimination every day that we shouldn’t help their oppressors out

Entertainment Entertainment Latest News, Entertainment Entertainment Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Beware the statistics that pop up in more than one story | Paul ChadwickOne reader’s query underlines the problem with quoting insufficiently examined figures, says the the Guardian readers’ editor, Paul Chadwick You mean the rather fantastic “97% of climate scientists” one here too, right? Let's ask Donald. quite so. but the main challenge here should be less to MSM than to HJS_Org whose whole purpose as a thinktank is to present policy recommendations on the basis of facts
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »