Furthermore, it’s ridiculous for Wilde to hide behind the idea of ~feminism~ in this instance. She — and likely Ray andfilm — made a dumb and awful choice to portray a professional woman as violating her profession’s baselineI don’t know how many times it must be restated: Feminism does not insulate you from criticism. It’s not “feminism” or the desire of professional women to have a.
capable people. The critique stems from the fact that this decision is a part of a long history of pop culture treating women journalists as only capable of spreading their legs.You don’t have to jump through hoops and break your back bending backward to defend your shitty decision under the guise of feminism.of the Atlanta bombing stories at the paper, said no one contacted him about their reporting process.
. “It’s obvious to me they did not go to any great lengths to find out what the real characters were like.”In fact, when you prop up this ridiculous trope, you make it harder for actual journalists to do our jobs. Instead, we spend time explaining that no, we’re not interested in your advances, we’d really just like to talk. And Scruggs was one of the good ones, according to her former colleagueseditor Mike King told the newspaper.
There’s an argument to be made that journalists have spent too many decades removed from the public, not explaining how our work is done.is not trying to have that debate. Instead, they chose to shit on a dead woman who was good at her job.
If the source were John Hamm and he wanted a go I don’t think I could turn him down.
It’s because if the awful me too and that white men are so mistreated so Clint Eastwood has to make parallels next he will yell at a empty chair representing feminazis
Is the source Jon Hamm?
Entertainment Entertainment Latest News, Entertainment Entertainment Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: DEADLINE - 🏆 109. / 63 Read more »
Source: THR - 🏆 411. / 53 Read more »